|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | DCE Linux memory defaults too low to allow Linux TCP to have >32767 byte window | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | dce | Reporter: | Chip Webb <ns3> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Hajime Tazaki <tazaki> |
| Status: | PATCH PENDING --- | ||
| Severity: | major | CC: | ns-bugs, ns3 |
| Priority: | P5 | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Bug Depends on: | 2129 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
| Attachments: | test case for checking DCE-Linux TCP memory and perf TCP window size and simulations with different node types | ||
|
Description
Chip Webb
2015-03-06 09:58:26 UTC
Thanks Chip for the report, and I fully agree with the proposed change. do you mind to provide a simulation script (minimum reproducible one is the best) so that I can confirm the issue ? the script will be also useful to avoid a future regression during nightly tests. thanks again. I tentatively fixed an issue. https://github.com/direct-code-execution/net-next-sim/commit/840e3c6dd9428b742bbda7cb60228acb7747b314 Since I don't have reproduced this issue yet in my local environment, I kept this issue opened until we come up with a test program. Thank you very much for proposing a fix. I confirm that the proposed patch works for me. Sorry it took so long to make a test case. I am attaching one in a minute, but using it requires fixing another bug that I will report in another minute. Created attachment 2050 [details]
test case for checking DCE-Linux TCP memory and perf TCP window size and simulations with different node types
I added a couple of commits to the net-next-sim. https://github.com/direct-code-execution/net-next-sim/commits/sim-ns3-2.6.36-branch with this version, the example 'dce-iperf-heterogeneous-multihop.cc' gives the following goodput with the default sysctl values (rmem/wmem). [ 3] 117.0-118.0 sec 2.00 MBytes 16.8 Mbits/sec [ 3] 118.0-119.0 sec 2.00 MBytes 16.8 Mbits/sec [ 3] 119.0-120.0 sec 1.88 MBytes 15.7 Mbits/sec [ 3] 0.0-120.0 sec 236 MBytes 16.5 Mbits/sec before the fix, it was like below. [ 3] 115.0-116.0 sec 640 KBytes 5.24 Mbits/sec [ 3] 116.0-117.0 sec 640 KBytes 5.24 Mbits/sec [ 3] 117.0-118.0 sec 640 KBytes 5.24 Mbits/sec [ 3] 118.0-119.0 sec 640 KBytes 5.24 Mbits/sec [ 3] 119.0-120.0 sec 640 KBytes 5.24 Mbits/sec [ 3] 0.0-120.2 sec 75.0 MBytes 5.24 Mbits/sec let me know if you still see any issue. |