Bug 62

Summary:	naming of methods in DefaultValue
Product:	ns-3	Reporter:	Tom Henderson <tomh>
Component:	core	Assignee:	ns-bugs <ns-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID
Severity:	minor
Priority:	P5
Version:	pre-release
Hardware:	Mac Intel
OS:	All
Attachments:	rename Bind to DefaultValue::Bind

Description Tom Henderson 2007-08-06 00:48:09 UTC

This is a carryover from the global routing discussion.
>
> >> - along the same lines, Bind() is kind of an oddball in the present
> >> system.  We do NodeList::Begin (), Simulator::Run (),
> >> CommandLine::Parse (); but simply Bind ().  This isn't consistent.
> >> 
> >> (note:  the choice of "bind()" was due to ns-2's methods of the same name)
> >> 

> >> Perhaps it would be better to do something like,
> >> 
> >> Configurator::Set ("DoStaticRouting", "true");
> >> 
> >> if (Configurator::IsEqual ("DoStaticRouting", "true"))
> >>    {
> >>    }
>
>Maybe it would make sense to try to stick the ns-2 naming scheme and use
>DefaultValue::Bind and DefaultValue::IsBound ?

Comment 1 Mathieu Lacage 2007-08-08 07:18:23 UTC

Any opposition to DefaultValue::Bind and DefaultValue::IsBound ?

Comment 2 Mathieu Lacage 2007-08-08 08:05:00 UTC

Created attachment 35 [details]
rename Bind to DefaultValue::Bind

Comment 3 Mathieu Lacage 2007-08-08 08:05:36 UTC

I did not implement IsBound since this would have required a few changes in a lot of places and we do not need it right away.

Comment 4 Mathieu Lacage 2008-04-15 11:39:43 UTC

code not there anymore.