Bug 1380 – lte-phy-uplink example crashes

Bug 1380 - lte-phy-uplink example crashes


Summary:	lte-phy-uplink example crashes

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Product:	ns-3
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	lte
Version:	pre-release
Hardware:	All All

Importance:	P5 major
Assigned To:	Nicola Baldo

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-02-29 09:06 UTC by John Abraham
Modified:	2012-05-19 11:02 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description John Abraham 2012-02-29 09:06:44 UTC

also in ns-3.13

due to 
msg="Logging component "LossModel" not found. See above for a list of available log components", file=../src/core/model/log.cc, line=280

Comment 1 John Abraham 2012-02-29 09:07:47 UTC

same applies for lte-phy-downlink

Comment 2 Tommaso Pecorella 2012-03-18 10:42:58 UTC

In lte-helper.cc:
  LogComponentEnable ("LtePropagationLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);
  LogComponentEnable ("LossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);
  LogComponentEnable ("ShadowingLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);
  LogComponentEnable ("PenetrationLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);
  LogComponentEnable ("MultipathLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);
  LogComponentEnable ("PathLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);

should be:
  LogComponentEnable ("LtePropagationLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);
  LogComponentEnable ("DiscreteTimeLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL); <<----
  LogComponentEnable ("ShadowingLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);
  LogComponentEnable ("PenetrationLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);
  LogComponentEnable ("JakesFadingLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL); <<----
  LogComponentEnable ("PathLossModel", LOG_LEVEL_ALL);
  
Mind, it's a best guess. I just grep'ed the NS_LOG_COMPONENT_DEFINE and seen what LOG components are missing and/or called but undefined. 2 are missing and 2 "similar" are not defined, so i guess there was a class renaming.

For completeness, the following components are not activated by the helper function, but they are defined:
src/lte/model/amc-module.cc:NS_LOG_COMPONENT_DEFINE ("AmcModule");
src/lte/model/bearer-qos-parameters.cc:NS_LOG_COMPONENT_DEFINE ("BearerQosParameters");
src/lte/model/channel-realization.cc:NS_LOG_COMPONENT_DEFINE ("ChannelRealization");
src/lte/model/ideal-control-messages.cc:NS_LOG_COMPONENT_DEFINE ("IdealControlMessage");
src/lte/model/lte-mac-header.cc:NS_LOG_COMPONENT_DEFINE ("LteMacHeader");
src/lte/model/lte-spectrum-signal-parameters.cc:NS_LOG_COMPONENT_DEFINE ("LteSpectrumSignalParameters");

I don't know if it was intended or not. Probably yes, so to not have too much spamming from the lower-layer components.

T.

Comment 3 Tom Henderson 2012-04-23 12:05:07 UTC

Will be fixed by the LENA LTE code merge when it happens

Comment 4 Tom Henderson 2012-05-18 17:19:30 UTC

can this be closed now?

Comment 5 Nicola Baldo 2012-05-19 11:02:09 UTC

Fixed by the LENA merge